Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergei Popov (businessman)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Randykitty (talk) 10:00, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sergei Popov (businessman) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little or no hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Reliable sources? Bash7oven (talk) 21:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:47, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 08:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just found this. [[1]] In 2008, he was the richest person in Europe under age 40. And notability doesn't go away even if net worth drops, right? Plus, #984 isn't that far from #800. ;-) TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The whole of the coverage on the subject is Europe's richest person under 40 is Sergei Popov. The 36-year-old was worth $6.4 billion in March when we last estimated his wealth. He spent the 1990s trading metals in the frosty environs of the Urals and Siberia, selling pipes and copper cable. As a client of MDM Bank, he became friendly with the company's young owner, Andrei Melnichenko.; which is at best very much marginally significant coverage; and still wouldn't allow us to write very much encyclopedic about him. What would be required is a good, independent source with at least a couple of in-depth paragraphs on him. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:25, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That would be true if there was unsourced material here. But there’s not. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 07:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.