Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RockAlone2k (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

RockAlone2k

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/RockAlone2k (2nd nomination)

RockAlone2k (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The AfD last year (at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remigiusz Maciaszek) ended with no consensus since nobody bothered to vote. Let me repeat: The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement." The refs include the subject's tweeter, youtube, homepage and and an intereview in the minor Polish portal NaTemat.pl. I hope this time someone else with comment... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

• Delete lacks the sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as there's of course going to be expected coverage but I'm still not finding anything actually convincing here to suggest minimally better. SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.