Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Q. Underhill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to A Treasure's Trove. MBisanz talk 01:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Robert Q. Underhill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This one is slightly tricky. There appear to be references, but they all lead to the promotion of a book, where the subject did contribute some jewelry as a sales gimmick. There are no references to the subject or his work, just to the book. The article tries to inherit that minimal notability. The subject fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE = WP:PROMOTION Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 18:21, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge
and redirectto A Treasure's Trove. The sources in this article, whilst a bit weak for this subject, will majorly enhance that article, which does need the references. Mabalu (talk) 12:49, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Comment Everything that comes up on a Google points to the equivalent of WP:SINGLEEVENT - in this case, the single event being the book. I've transferred some of the references and info over to the book page. I could only find one RS for Underhill that wasn't really about the book, 1 and it's not really enough for an article. He obviously has skill and talent, but doesn't seem to have really received enough coverage/publicity so doesn't seem to demonstrate notability in himself outside being the creator of some - not all - of the Trove jewels. Not even sure he warrants a redirect - the mention on A Treasure's Trove is probably sufficient for now. Mabalu (talk) 13:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to A Treasure's Trove., which is where the notability is. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.