Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Foods

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Rebel Foods

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Rebel Foods (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Purely WP:PROMO, Lacks WP:SIGCOV. Having no encyclopedic value in the first place. Hence, calling for an AfD. - Hatchens (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Comment: Kindly note, this page is an iteration of this company Faasos... seems to be created purely due to some rebranding activity. If not delete, then it can be merged with this page. -Hatchens (talk) 11:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:25, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Keep Meets NCORP/GNG and has been vetted through AFC. The article is barely a few lines long, so any "promo" concerns can be addressed by self before sending the article to deletion, per WP:ATD. The nominator needs to be careful before marking articles as "paid" in bad faith. Such behavior is borderline disruptive. M4DU7 (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

  NOTE: This vote is added by the creator of the article. - Hatchens (talk) 12:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• Keep. Article has some very solid references - in-depth coverage of the subject from some very reliable sources (Bloomberg, Times of India, Business Standard etc). That alone shows the subject meets the notability standard, regardless of whether the article was started as paid promo or not. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:51, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
• Keep. Although the sources are not well known in the USA, since this is an establishment in India, it seems to be notable in it's own market and significant coverage from local sources. Expertwikiguy (talk) 10:48, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
• Keep for now: The company is certainly notable enough to warrant its own article. Seems to be the largest cloud kitchen company in India and is affiliated with Wendy's which gives a sense of the company's scale. Article needs significant improvement and more citations though. Prolix 💬 13:32, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

  Thanks a lot Prolix.. for chipping in. Your opinion matters. - Hatchens (talk) 14:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.