Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publify (2nd nomination)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 22:40, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Publify (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was closed as no consensus due to poor participation, though both people who commented thought it should be deleted. I couldn't establish that it has the significance or coverage to meet WP:N. This has been in CAT:NN for 12 years - I really hope we can now get the participation to get an answer on this. Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:12, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - not an expert on software but is there even a claim to meeting WP:NSOFT here? Doesn't look like it. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up press releases and incidental mentions but no significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - due to lack of evidence of meeting NSOFT or GNG Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.