Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro wrestling fan names
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Pro wrestling fan names (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article, comprised entirely of original research, is on a non-notable subject that has absolutely no encyclopedic value. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 18:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom. Certainly not encyclopaedic enough to merit an article in its own right. David Mestel(Talk) 19:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a member of WP:PW; this doesn't even come close to notable. D.M.N. (talk) 21:13, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per D.M.N. Feedback ☎ 21:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, OR. Nikki311 22:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An editor has expressed concern that this article or section may be unencyclopedic and should be deleted, and they're completely right for reasons already listed here.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 06:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Crap, spam. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete why was it even created? Jordan Morrison Payne 16:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 23:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non notable article that's frankly a waste of space. NiciVampireHeart (talk) 06:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. iMatthew (talk) 14:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Cheers, LAX 22:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —Nikki311 20:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.