Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peggy Friend

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Peggy Friend

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Peggy Friend (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Friend signed a contract in the AAGPBL, but may not have even played, according to the article text. Her entry in the AAGPBL website states "This player has not been located. We have no additional information..." I've done searches on Newspapers.com, google, and have looked in The women of the All-American Girls Professional Baseball League: a biographical dictionary but have not found any significant coverage. As a result, she fails the general notability guideline. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, and Baseball. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:12, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete this article is clearly not ready for publicatdion. If an enthusiastic editor wants to userfy, I have no objection.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 11:03, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
• Delete - Article fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. The article should not say something like "additional information is incomplete because there are no records available at the time of the request" but that fact that there's so little on this individual that the fact that there's no record of the person is a point that someone felt needed to be brought up in the prose is a very good sign that notability's not there and that there's not enough to write anything beyond a stub. Maybe records can be found and the topic can be revisited, but notability certainly needs to be established first. - Aoidh (talk) 22:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.