Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OS 0.1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. North America1000 15:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- OS 0.1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Assuming the relevant policy is WP:NALBUM, it fails all criteria - never made any real impact on charts or with sales, no evidence of being broadcast on radio or television networks. Main DEPROD concern was that the mixtape was subject of multiple reliable source reviews - a Google search however reveals close to nothing with several search terms. Hiàn (talk) 03:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hiàn (talk) 03:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping Atlantic306. Hiàn (talk) 03:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Keep,the article already has links to reviews in reliable sources coverage, Allmusic and Progressive Sounds, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, there's nothing to suggest that Progressive Sounds is a reliable source - the Wikipedia article for it is completely unsourced. As ever with dance music, there may well be sources out there in print versions of Mixmag and the like, but as ever, without any access to these magazines, it's impossible to say with any certainty that the sources exist to keep this article. Richard3120 (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing how Progressive Sounds is remotely close to being reliable (given that it appears that there hasn't been any activity since ~2015 (and it appears to be closer to a blog than a reliable review site). The fact that the mixtape is logged on Allmusic (and that it has no more information than we already have) and no other reliable source does not prove anything tangible. Unless you can provide any other reliable links, I'm unfortunately not seeing your point. Hiàn (talk)editing on mobile account. 18:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, as there are doubts about the reliability of Progressive sounds Ive struck my keep and am neutral pending any other rs being found Atlantic306 (talk) 15:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing how Progressive Sounds is remotely close to being reliable (given that it appears that there hasn't been any activity since ~2015 (and it appears to be closer to a blog than a reliable review site). The fact that the mixtape is logged on Allmusic (and that it has no more information than we already have) and no other reliable source does not prove anything tangible. Unless you can provide any other reliable links, I'm unfortunately not seeing your point. Hiàn (talk)editing on mobile account. 18:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Atlantic306, there's nothing to suggest that Progressive Sounds is a reliable source - the Wikipedia article for it is completely unsourced. As ever with dance music, there may well be sources out there in print versions of Mixmag and the like, but as ever, without any access to these magazines, it's impossible to say with any certainty that the sources exist to keep this article. Richard3120 (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.