Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Brooks (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Nick Brooks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
notability guidelines, lack of proper citations and third party sources, Seniorpenor (talk) 03:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Your claims are unfounded as to me that youtube video is pretty straight forward third party source, and based upon what i have seen from you and others it seems to me and this is my personal opinion that you have a personal vendetta against this person. So my vote no deletion. Sure the article needs a little clean up so i am going to vote to keep.ProTector (talk) 12:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC) — ProTector (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- You Tube is not a reliable source. AinslieL (talk) 08:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE as he hasn't worked in the top level of his sport (FCW is nothing but a farm team). Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of third party coverage. Nikki♥311 20:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nikki AinslieL (talk) 08:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ainslie is right about You Tube as a source. Podgy Stuffn (talk) 03:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.