Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nautilus Pompilius (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SSTflyer 15:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Nautilus Pompilius (band)

Nautilus Pompilius (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable band, article includes no references to reliable, independent, secondary sources. Even the Russian version of the article only has references to mentions in who's who-type listings. KDS4444^Talk 09:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Have added a reference and a couple of external links, hope it's enough to show that the band is notable. Gweorth (talk) 12:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

• Keep. One of the most famous Russian bands, see, e.g. here (by Richard Stites), here, (by Birgit Beumers), here (by Artemy Troitsky), in Russian: [1] (by Andrei Burlaka), [2] and in many other Russian music and rock encyclopedias and magazines (for further searching, see here). --Tamtam90 (talk) 19:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Sources identified indicate notability. --Michig (talk) 08:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Article certainly needs a lot of specific sourcing, but I'm convinced of the band's notability. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
• Comment – See WP:NEXIST. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:16, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
• Keep. Thirty+ year old band with a long article on ruwiki, sources exist to prove notability. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 10:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.