Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mocho Mountains
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SNOW. Consensus is that it meets WP:GEOLAND. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mocho Mountains (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sole source is a dictionary. Not sure it passes our notability guidelines for geographic features. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:48, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:03, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Easy keep per WP:GEOLAND, a quick web search brought up a number of sources, I have added two quickly to the article. SportingFlyer talk 07:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- EASY KEEP per WP:GEOLAND FOARP (talk) 08:42, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND, WP:GEOPURP (source:[1])--PATH SLOPU (Talk) 11:31, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:GEO, per above, someone close this ... please ... quick. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.