Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Materia Magica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:50, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Materia Magica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. A redirect to List of MUDs would work if someone finds suitable reliable references to source its entry. czar 03:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 03:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources, and the custom search comes up empty. The mudconnect.com review looks self-published, and the standard Google results are generally about occultism. There was a hit or two on Google Books for lists of MUDs, but that's obviously a trivial mention. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Can't find any meaningful sourcing. —chaos5023 (talk) 14:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Note: Please don't redirect to List of MUDs; that list's inclusion criteria consist of having an article or a section of an article on the MUD, so a redirect is just a mess to clean up. —chaos5023 (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: There is no indication that the game is noteworthy, or even any clear description in this article what the game is.OtterAM (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • SNOW Delete as I simply found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 22:38, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.