Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MatchPoint America

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MatchPoint America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I simply found nothing to suggest better notability and improvement and the best results I found were here (at the bottom), here (same results) and this with this also found nothing useful and it seems they're about a company. Notifying possibly interested RJFJR (who recently removed a tag). Thus with no improvement and alternative to deletion, there's nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 02:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 02:40, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • 'Comment The wording and arrangement of the personnel section is exactly characteristic of a/ 'press releases and b/ WP articles written by those experienced in writing press releases. DGG ( talk ) 20:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. relatively limited distribution, and not notable. DGG ( talk ) 06:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - minor TV show. Article seems to be more about its non notable anchors than anything else. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.