Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manjil india
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Michig (talk) 09:11, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Manjil india (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has no evidence of notability and written like an advertisment, I placed tags on the page before but the creator had removed it, I didn't go for a PROD because I knew that the creator will remove it again TheChampionMan1234 03:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability cited, but deserves a listing in TV Guide Mumbai for sure. --Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 22:24, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:11, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As usual with non-western entities this is difficult but I feel that a simple Google search would have returned a lot more hits than what I'm seeing. Also, the channel is basically new, so this might be a simple attempt at promotion. I'd say it fails WP:GNG and may be a case of too soon. §FreeRangeFrog 02:31, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable tv channel. Delete per WP:GNG. --Odie5533 (talk) 08:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.