Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mandaue's Administration
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mandaue's Administration (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged with unclear and confusing tag since 2010. No references and not notable. HueMan1 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Philippines. HueMan1 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --TheLonelyPather (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete no sources makes a merge out of the question. It's time to start stacking up the WP:TNT. BrigadierG (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete: Nonsense article with zero sources. Macktheknifeau (talk) 18:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as confusing. I don't think there's any info here that can be merged back to Mandaue. --Lenticel (talk) 09:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant. There are articles already for subject article's contents: mainly for the history of Mandaue local government (partial) and the list of its town/city heads.—Raider000 (talk) 05:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.