Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maahir

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maahir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From what I have seen, this film fails WP:NFILM and W:GNG, because there is an absence of substantive coverage in reliable, secondary sources. Additionally, none of the individuals involved are notable enough for all of their work to be inherently notable. I actually came to this because it was created by a user now blocked, but there were questions over whether it was G5 eligible, and so the consensus was to PROD their creations. The PROD was removed by another editor who felt this needed a full AfD. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 17:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 17:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep It seems to be a movie with two massively huge Bollywood superstars: Hema Malini and Govinda. Biwom (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Pre-internet coverage online for Indian films is difficult to find. Does that mean anything pre-internet is automatically non-notable? Nope. We look anyway, consider cast and crew and then WP:CSB and WP:NTEMP... IE:
year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
music:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
2006 distributor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
and per WP:INDAFD "Maahir movie" "Lawrence D'Souza" "Talat Rekhi" "Harish Barot" "Bappi Lahiri" "Monang Films International" "Hema Malini" "Govinda" "Farha Naaz" "Raj Babbar" to see that it is not impossible to source them. A commercial screening almost 2 decades after initial release is one of those notability considerations. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • MichaelQSchmidt, I'm certainly willing to reconsider my position if enough reliable coverage is provided; but you've provided a bunch of search results of the people related to this movie, which do not really add to notability. Regards, Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:21, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 09:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.