Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucia Lucarini

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:11, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lucia Lucarini

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Lucia Lucarini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded without rationale or improvement. Doesn't meet either WP:GNG or WP:NATHLETE. Onel5969 TT me 03:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 03:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:56, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Lacks significant coverage and so it fails the GNG. There is no narrative beyond a couple of brief notes, probably derived from a statistical source. No Great Shaker (talk) 10:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Quoting WP:NATHLETE Finished top 3 in any other major senior level international competition I see two here. There is no additional sport specific guideline for fencing. Another irrational AfD from the same NOM who apparently can't read. Also nominating Michela Battiston and Camilla Mancini also medalists from the same competition. I think this NOM should be blocked from further disruptions. Trackinfo (talk) 19:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - someone doesn't seem to understand that Universiade's are not senior competitions.Onel5969 TT me 04:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment. Someone does not seem to understand that Universiade is a Senior competition (for students between 18 and 25) and does not seem to know very well the great value of being an Universiade winner especially in Fencing.--Binbaksa (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, and I quote, the universiade is "an international multi-sport event, organized for university athletes" (emphasis mine). Therefore, not a senior event.Onel5969 TT me 16:39, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am not aware of Universiade's downgrading from a global competition of University students to a youth level meet. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to where that discussion has been held. Trackinfo (talk) 19:26, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. University level competitions are not senior meets.Onel5969 TT me 19:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh. You apparently do not have a decision to base that on. Trackinfo (talk) 03:29, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete If the Universiade is a major senior event why does the FIE give no rating points for it? How is a university competition considered "the highest level", which is what WP:NSPORT requires? Not seeing significant coverage to meet the GNG and a world ranking of #143[1] does not show notability.Sandals1 (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Redirect to Italy at the 2019 Summer Universiade I do not see anything that convinces me that WP:NSPORT is met since subject has never competed at the highest level. I'm not seeing the coverage to show WP:GNG is met and it looks like WP:BLP1E applies since all claimed notability stems from the one Universiade. I think Sandals1 makes good points. Having said all that, I am willing to accept a redirect to the aforementioned article. I just don't think an individual article is warranted at this time. Papaursa (talk) 00:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lucia_Lucarini&oldid=912546643"