Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucia Aldana
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 00:42, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lucia Aldana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ANYBIO, needs to win Miss World otherwise WP:NN & WP:TOOSOON MJH (talk) 23:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- first of all it is Miss Universe that she will compete in. secondly, being the national representative in a major beauty pageant is notable. All contestants each year have their separate articles so I dont see a point in this nomination. TOOSOON does not apply as she has won a national major title.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:ONEEVENT, as with other Miss Universe contestant articles without notability elsewhere. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 13:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to closing admin: Both Habagat and user sue rangel has one thing in common they !voted on all these Miss Universe 2012 contestants AfDs within a few minutes time. And with the same reasonings on them all.--BabbaQ (talk) 20:32, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You may want to look at the posting times above. We posted our comments on completely different days. I responded further to this nonsense at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Christela --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss Colombia 2012, and do the same for all beauty pageant contestant articles where the only justification is that they competed in a pageant and there are no other sources to indicate additional notability. Mabalu (talk) 11:17, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep We have an established practice where winners of major national competitions are sufficiently notable for an individual article. Repeated common practice is a guideline. As far as my personal interests are concerned, and in consideration of the small amount of information, we might usefully combine some of these., but that should be a general discussion, not here, where it is obviously receiving little attention. (It might depend on the relative importance of the different competitions, a question about which I have no knowledge), So, keep for now. The suggestion to combine with Miss Columbia 2012 is one possibility, but not the only one. DGG ( talk ) 06:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per FreeRangeFrog's statement on Alexia Viruez AFD. If there is precedent, that's good enough for me. Mabalu (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Mabalu - being a national pageant winner and a contestant in the Miss Universe is clearly enough to be notable. Lukeno94 (talk) 11:33, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She won the national pageant. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 12:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.