Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Edgar Acree
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to USS Lloyd E. Acree. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lloyd Edgar Acree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG. One posthumous award of the Navy Cross and a rank of Aviation ordnanceman 3rd Class doesn't make him notable. His role as namesake of the USS Lloyd E. Acree is set out on that page. Mztourist (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 03:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to USS Lloyd E. Acree as the ship's namesake; doesn't pass GNG, WP:NPERSON, or SOLDIER. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:58, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to the ship. Not independently notable. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete totally fails GNG which is the minimum standard for all articles. Any article that fails to meet GNG should be deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect to the ship. Something that should, IMO, be done for many (if not most) of the these articles. Intothatdarkness 17:21, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.