Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of things claimed to possess 365 of something
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. as the article creator indicates they no longer need this page as well as those editors arguing for Deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of things claimed to possess 365 of something (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Likely fails WP:NLIST. Lordseriouspig 21:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lordseriouspig 21:18, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Userfy.Article creator Ridiculopathy is still a relatively new editor who has made good contributions and didn't fully understand the rules around WP:NLIST and WP:LISTCRITERIA. We discussed this on my Talk page (since archived). I would send it back to user space to give the editor a chance to salvage the sections worth saving for another article (and most likely rename a subset of the draft or just get it deleted it when they're done). Cielquiparle (talk) 21:29, 7 July 2024 (UTC)- Thanks @Cielquiparle, I've taken the necessary sources off it and am satisfied to let it be deleted now it needs be. I'd self delete it myself but am away from my laptop at present. Thanks Ridiculopathy (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ridiculopathy Technically you can't delete an article unless you're an admin, but you can request deletion. Cielquiparle (talk) 08:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, Ridiculopathy (talk) 10:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Ridiculopathy Technically you can't delete an article unless you're an admin, but you can request deletion. Cielquiparle (talk) 08:07, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @Cielquiparle, I've taken the necessary sources off it and am satisfied to let it be deleted now it needs be. I'd self delete it myself but am away from my laptop at present. Thanks Ridiculopathy (talk) 00:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not opposed to userfying, but I'm skeptical there are enough sources which treat these as a group. It doesn't appear there are any in the article itself yet. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Userfy per Cielquiparle. Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - fails LIST and the creator has salvaged it already. Bearian (talk) 15:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Interesting, but not encyclopedic, and no need to userfy. Geschichte (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.