Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of games using Steam authentication

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 20:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of games using Steam authentication (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

With Steam now having more than 6000 games, and the majority using at least one of the Steam authentication aspects (eg around 3000+ games using the Trading Card feature), this list is now basically mirroring the Steam game catalog, making it a failure of WP:NOT#CATALOG. It also can be a magnet for non-notable games on the service. Perhaps the only special aspect we might track is if there was a retail disc, but even then this seems unnecessary and there are other ways to do this (categories). As such, this list is inappropriate and unwieldy for en.wiki. MASEM (t) 17:15, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:12, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:13, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nomination. I also feel there'd be a WP:V issue - as I don't think this is something frequently covered in third party reliable sources. (And if all verification is coming from first party accounts, then we're right back at WP:NOTCATALOGUE - why even document this? Just check Steam itself.) Sergecross73 msg me 20:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nomination. Power~enwiki (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.