Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy characters
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. joe deckertalk to me 20:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- List of The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only one source, this article does not enough sources and it has no real world coverage to establish the notability. JJ98 (Talk) 08:23, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, this is a typical split-off article from a notable television series article, so insisting on the notability of the characters apart from the series is missing the point. Obviously the characters of a series need to be described in order to have comprehensive coverage of that series, so the only options are to keep as a stand-alone list or to merge to the series article, not to delete outright. It's clearly too long for The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy to incorporate it (even if the entire "minor characters" section were removed), so stand-alone it is. postdlf (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —JJ98 (Talk) 21:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As noted by Postdlf, this would require either merger or a keep. The current article is too long to merge comfortably, so... Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - As stated above, a series of this type deserves some sort of character list. Without it, there would not be proper coverage of the series. I also believe that sources could be found if one looked hard enough. Blake (Talk·Edits) 17:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.