Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Halo multiplayer maps (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:14, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- List of Halo multiplayer maps (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a game guide. Yes, there are sources, but they are strategy guides for the maps, hardly content that would be suitable for Wikipedia. As it stands currently, the only out-of-game information is the release date of each item. James086Talk 18:15, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. My comments at the previous AfD still stand; there isn't enough information about the development of specific maps, let alone reception of them, to fill an article or establish notability outside of Halo's multiplayer (which is notable, and covered within each game.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 18:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) ★☆ Stubbleboy 18:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Innappropriate content and NOT GUIDE. -- The1337gamer (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dave Fuchs. If there's no critical commentary or information on development then it's WP:GAMETRIVIA. --Teancum (talk) 22:20, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE. The article is just a list of content with no real analytical value. There also isn't sufficient coverage for the maps themselves other then what is already summarized on each respective article's page. Stubbleboy 23:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:GAMECRUFT. Pretty much useless to the average reader, assuming they do not play the Halo series. ~ satellizer ~ talk ~ 05:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:NOTGUIDE. These maps have not received enough individual (not where the game is the main topic) coverage to warrant a separate article, neither do they have enough reliable sourcing to warrant a split from the main article. Previous AfD keeps refer to WP:USEFUL and apparent reliable sources (I see guides only) for keeping. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 13:50, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with a heavy heart. I'm a fan of the game series and will port this to some other appropriate wiki, but I regret creating it and realise trying to give the list a chance was futile. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 15:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I regret changing my stance at the previous AFD since none of the changes I suggested have been implemented. This list is currently a game guide. I still think a "Gameplay of Halo" article is likely to be notable but there is nothing in this list that needs to be preserved in order to create said article. Axem Titanium (talk) 21:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:NOTGUIDE. No info on reception or notability outside Halo. Jucchan (talk) 23:59, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:GAMECRUFT and WP:NOTGUIDE violation. ZappaOMati 00:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Game Over - Wikipedia is not a game guide. This article is also pure gamecruft. Belongs somewhere else, not in a project like this. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Belongs on the Halo Wikia, not Wikipedia. XapApp (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.