Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Candace Whittemore Lovely exhibitions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I would be happy to refund this to the userspace of anyone who wants to develop material towards a merger. Vanamonde (talk) 17:29, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

List of Candace Whittemore Lovely exhibitions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

List of Candace Whittemore Lovely exhibitions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of exhibitions. Wikipedia is not a place to post one's resume or CV. The only references are press releases and a permanent dead link (not archived). Vexations (talk) 12:53, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

• Limited merge. A few of the more significant exhibitions can be included in the main article but this great big list has to go. --DanielRigal (talk) 13:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Do you have suggestions as to which notable exhibitions (with citations) might be included? Vexations (talk) 16:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Given the lack of information it is hard to know which of the exhibitions are most notable without a lot of research. My thought would be to exclude all but the solo exhibitions and then to exclude all the remaining entries where the venue does not have an article. That would leave a list of solo exhibitions at notable galleries. Those would be candidates for mentioning in the main article. Find an independent review of such an exhibition in a reliable source and I'd call it a good candidate for inclusion. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:IINFO.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 13:38, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

• Limited merge a few items might be transferred to her puffed-up article, but this CV style list has to go.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:05, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:17, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOTIINFO and WP:NOTRESUME. Ajf773 (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOTIINFO, WP:NOTRESUME. Note that Candace Whittemore Lovely is under-sourced PROMO for this decidedly minor, marginally notable, artist.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:05, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.