Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Moren Bromma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Lisa Moren Bromma

Lisa Moren Bromma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As unfortunately, my searches found no better sources with the best results here, here and here. The article may seem acceptable in a way (especially compared to other articles) but there's nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

• Delete: as non-notable individual. Fails GNG. Quis separabit? 19:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Wrote two business books that were published by McGraw-Hill, and apparently a successful businesswoman, but does not seem to have had any major affect on the world or her area of expertise that would account for encyclopedic notability. LaMona (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.