Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against another nomination. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia

Legal Aid Society of the District of Columbia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication this organization meets WP:ORG. BEFORE shows many local sources mentioning this, but none that discuss it in detail, and nothing from out of Washington. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH. John from Idegon (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. I created this page as part of a project to improve Wikipedia's coverage of legal history and legal aid organizations in the United States. Right now, aside from the 800-pound gorilla of legal aid (the Legal Aid Society of New York), there are only a few pages on random legal aid organizations with no apparent rhyme or reason, in particular Legal Aid Society of Louisville, Colorado Legal Services, Wyoming Legal Services, Inc., and Legal Aid Society of Cleveland. The Legal Aid Society of D.C. is the largest and oldest legal services organization in D.C., a large and growing city with a large population of indigent residents who rely on it for legal representation and advice. It has an excellent reputation inside and outside D.C. and does high-quality and cutting-edge work. (I don't work there and have no affiliation with it.) Sfeldman (talk) 23:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.