Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Women for Shared Parenting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. King of 03:57, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leading Women for Shared Parenting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. Advocacy, not encyclopedic information 2. No substantial independent third party sources: Time is an uncritical interview with the President where she says whatever she cares to, Everything else is straight-forward advocacy by a member or officer of the association, Relatively subtle--most merely mention the organization at the end. Not all of them are what we'd call RS in any event, e.g. Daily caller. DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per DGG's statements; the majority of what I found were op-eds in various media - both reliable sources as well as blogs - by Molly Olson and/or Terry Brennan, who are co-founders of the organization, or other members such as Suzanne Venker or Lori Barkus. LovelyLillith (talk) 23:04, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.