Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ladnav
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 12:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ladnav (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Completely WP:NN magazine that only published one issue. Created by a SPA editor with inherent COI. {{Findsourcesnotice}} turns up nothing related to the magazine. Toddst1 (talk) 16:04, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can find only the barest of references to this magazine's ever having existed, and the principal sources seem to be Wikipedia. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no "conflict of interest" and that's irrelevant anyway to whether the article should stay or not. Todd previously complained that the magazine was defunct, not sure what his real objection is. Ladnavfan (talk) 03:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Totally non-notable. Unable to find evidence of coverage, let alone significant coverage. References in article do not provide any. Bongomatic 05:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Practically invisible as far as Google is concerned. Defunct does not generally imply non-notable, but in this particular case there is no reason for keeping the article. Favonian (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above, non-notable. Dayewalker (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, just an attempt to promote the magazine. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.