Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kids Suite
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:10, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Kids Suite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not a notable streaming video product.
If kept: much of the content is unsourced (and possibly wrong) and the title must change, there are many other things called "Kids Suite". power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what other notable products are called Kids Suite, and what you think is wrong? Bell TV has a lot of customers and this is included in all the packages, it's notable. ScratchMarshall (talk) 17:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Unless I'm really missing something here, I don't think there are any inclusion standards for "video on demand collections". Therefore this would need to pass the GNG, and there's absolutely no suggestion that the subject does — there isn't even a claim to notability in the article. Has this particular collection of Peppa Pig streaming content had some significant societal impact that other bundles of Peppa videos have not? The existing references simply assert that this service exists. A Traintalk 23:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.