Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Pakistan Medical Students
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions consist of handwaving and there has been no followup to the reasonable questions asked of those expressing these opinions. Sandstein 18:12, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Journal of Pakistan Medical Students (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relatively new journal that has not yet had time to establish itself as notable. No independent sources, not covered in any major selective databases. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Guillaume2303 (talk) 06:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Part of series of articles created by a member of the editorial board who has a clear COI. JFW | T@lk 23:42, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's one of the first international, peer reviewed medical journals in Pakistan. Google shows many links. I'm sure this is deserving of an article. Mar4d (talk) 01:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Question And which one of those 105 results constitutes significant coverage in a reliable source (excluding stuff like Medicalopedia, for example)? --Guillaume2303 (talk) 07:39, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article, feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it is one of the first student journals from Pakistan recognized and indexed in many major journal indexations.119.73.50.157 (talk) 04:35, 14 December 2011 (UTC) — 119.73.50.157 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Would you mind sharing with us which "major journal indexations" this journal is recognized and indexed by? And are they selective? --Guillaume2303 (talk) 06:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.