Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Hornig
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Joan Hornig (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Simply not a notable designer, sorry. Advertising page mainly referencing by her own website Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 04:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note for an admin - WP:WITHDRAWN as references have been found by Mabalu and someone (maybe me) will fix the article --Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 18:57, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 06:08, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Article appears to have been initiated by the subject. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:39, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Whilst the article is excessively promotional, the subject does have coverage. She is known and recognised. I can see numerous good sources on Google News that could be used to improve the article. She has a high profile and people do seem to know who she is: Oprah Magazine, 2009 1, 2, 3, 4(already in article), 5 (ditto) - there's a lot of material on Google News going back over 10 years. The article can be rewritten and improved to make it less promotional. It does not require deleting. Mabalu (talk) 17:11, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - In addition to the sources noted above, there is a profile piece (in German) in [1] in Der Spiegel. I can't read German but the machine translation from google makes it quite clear that this is significant coverage with Hornig as the primary subject. -- Whpq (talk) 17:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⋘HueSatLum ? ❢⋙ 15:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Gongshow Talk 17:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.