Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jo Graham
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jo Graham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete non notable author. Only has one book out, relaeased last year, and all refs are to her own site or publishers catalogue. Mayalld (talk) 17:18, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, got starred review in Publisher's Weekly (didn't take long to find and add to article, after the original editor had mentioned it on talk page). PamD (talk) 17:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It got a starred review from Publishers Weekly, which means it's "a book to watch." Her second novel is due in March 2009 and has already received a starred review from Kirkus Reviews. I'm working on expanding the references now. -CaptainJae (talk) 17:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Per the improved sourcing. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Author has yet to receive significant critical acclaim (WP:CREATIVE). - Eldereft (cont.) 18:11, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:CREATIVE. Schuym1 (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. It seems a shame, because it's very likely to meet WP:CREATIVE in the next year or two, but doesn't meet it yet. THF (talk) 00:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.