Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Tarlov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Tarlov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not such an expert in the US internal politics, may be she is extremely notable, but of the two references with some claim of notability the Fox News one is dead (and in any case only expected to assert that she has at least once been invited to the Fox News), and LAT is about her father, not about her. Ymblanter (talk) 09:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:25, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete what she would be notable for would not be as a politican, but as a journalist. However her contributions as a journalist lack indepdnet (as opposed to network advertising) coverage, and so do not lead to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I see no claim to notability as a journalist. Ifnord (talk) 14:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.