Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Page Morrell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, noting that the nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other arguments for deletion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Page Morrell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Deleted 2008, re-created. Sending WP:APPNOTE to Aboutmovies. Boleyn (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. sst 05:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I found a few sources, but it's so borderline. I added them and cleaned up the article. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:08, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Ran a Proquest news archive search on her name. This is a good search, but very far from exhaustive. Got 29 hits. Began adding them to article starting at the top. Revidews in big, daily newspapers, essays about writing that discuss her advice, added them as I went down the list. Stopped after the seventh hit, because that was more than enough to establish notability. There are lots of sources out there, if/when someone undertakes to improve this article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 21:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw nomination per E,M. Gregory. Good work! Boleyn (talk) 10:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.