Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamaal Anderson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, reliable sources showing notability beyond average college athlete. NawlinWiki 19:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Jamaal_Anderson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- (View AfD)
Drafting still fails WP:BIO.Hondasaregood 14:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep-Please undelete this article--Bucs10 02:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Bucs10[reply]
- Strong Keep- This article does not fail WP:BIO. He is a major college football player that played at the highest level. He has been rumored (by several reliable sources) to be a very high level draft pick in upcoming draft. There are many reliable sources which document all of the facts.--Thomas.macmillan 15:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep- Anderson will be a NFL player within three months. It wouldn't make any sense deleting this article now. --Bender235 19:58, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Predicted top 5 draft pick. I don't even see how it fails WP:BIO: Sportspeople/athletes/competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming, or at the highest level in mainly amateur sports or other competitive activities that are themselves considered notable, including college sports in the United States.↔NMajdan•talk
- Strong keep: When will people with no knowledge of a subject (in this case, football) stop making determinations on whether or not he is notable enough. It seems like someone nominates a football player for deletion at least once a week. Fortunately they are never successful. Seancp 21:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per all above (except nom). --MECU≈talk 21:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable and verified. Contains more in-line references than Dumpling. Passes WP:BIO. Part of building a complete reference guide to this topic. Johntex\talk 06:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.