Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Harrison (footballer, born 1996)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While it is agreed that they do not meet the requirements of WP:FOOTY, the arguments for meeting WP:GNG are more well-developed and documented than those arguing against meeting the notability criteria. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Jack Harrison (footballer, born 1996)

Jack Harrison (footballer, born 1996) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG JMHamo (talk) 20:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. JMHamo (talk) 20:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete Has yet to play in a WP:FPL so fails WP:NFOOTY. Seasider91 (talk) 21:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete, I've filled the refs, but obviously non-notable. I would have considered speedy if I'd got here first Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:29, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication of any collage award to satisfy NCOLLATH. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy either NHSPHSATH or widerGNG. Fenix down (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep has received a good amount of non trivial news coverage in both England and the USA since being picked 1st in the MLS super draft Arials101 (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
• Delete: Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 23:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep Notable coverage has now been received including two major UK newspapers. Red Jay (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep Meets WP:NOTABLE, might be WP:TOOSOON, but it's a waste of time to just delete for this article to pop up again. FMUSAPyramid (talk) 17:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep Meets WP:GNG with massive international media coverage - which isn't surprising as he was the number one draft pick in the 2016 MLS SuperDraft. Nfitz (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep The title of The Telegraph says it best: "Jack Harrison 'no longer a secret' in England after MLS No 1 draft pick and move to New York City FC" The first sentence in the article goes on to say: "Jack Harrison may be little known in England but that is all about to change." Tradedia^talk 01:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Fails WP:NFOOTBALL but passes WP:GNG The Telegraph Guardian.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep significant coverage, enough for the purposes of satisfying GNG Matthew Thompson ^{talk to me!} 10:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:20, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

• Keep meets WP:GNG. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 08:29, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep easy decision here. Failing NFOOTY does not mean he cannot meet GNG, which he clearly does, as a quick web search demonstrates. For example, major news sites that have published articles about him include: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. FuriouslySerene (talk) 22:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
• Keep – Upon a review of sources available, the subject meets WP:BASIC. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.