Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignatius Krekshino
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Ignatius Krekshino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ANYBIO no references included or found to support claims to notability. A working priest who converted and wrote some articles. Single blog ref is the complete source of this article. -MJH (talk) 22:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 21:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete :All I could find on google were other Wikipedia pages. For the most part. I guess he existed. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no notability has been demonstrated in the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't seem to be notable.--Staberinde (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.