Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IIUG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I know I'm taking a chance here -- but this seems like advert spam for this web forum. The article on the forum's subject, Informix, already lists a link to this user's group under External links. Does the forum need it's own article too with 4 more links to the forum website? Mattisse 18:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. IIUG article should be merged into an Informix category (if there is any IIUG-specific information) or left as an external link there, and IIUG could redirect there. This article contains no actual content. --JCipriani 18:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - This doesn't appear notable enough to motivate anyone to even take care of the article...been on the wikify list since April. Akradecki 21:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Peta 06:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.