Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Gunderson (artist) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar ⨹ 16:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Henry Gunderson (artist)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Henry Gunderson (artist)
• Articles for deletion/Henry Gunderson (artist) (2nd nomination)

Henry Gunderson (artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns. Launchballer 01:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  02:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  02:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  02:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  02:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:13, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Comment: I'm not finding anything notable. Here is a CV from his site, and no reviews, and no major shows, and another here that is more up to date.. Theredproject (talk) 21:40, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

I followed the links on the references, and half are dead links. There is this and this, though, in advance of a show curated by Hans Ulrich Obrist, though no reviews of the show itself.Theredproject (talk) 21:53, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter¹²³ (gab) @ 18:07, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

• Delete. The coverage thus far does not rise to the requisite notability level, as far as I see. This is a pure WP:TOOSOON one. Neutrality^talk 05:17, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable at this time. No independent coverage found from a web search. --Michig (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.