Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoGui
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- GoGui (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Disputed prod. I cannot determine by reading the article whether this is a notable piece of software or not. A Google search didn't help me; my search yielded the usual download sites and PR pieces, and using google news showed no useful hits on this subject. Creator entered into discussion but did not comment on notability or add any cites that would demonstrate notability before removing prod, so I'll bring it here for discussion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Computer stuff (compared to say fine art) gets more than it fair share of web mentions. The fact that there are no WP:RS, and the town in Mali gets more hits, confirmss this is non notable. I found this mention - but strengthens the case [1] for non notable since it is so trivial. Where is the articla in at least a computer magazine?Obina (talk) 14:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable --Blowdart | talk 15:06, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No RS. Sounds like G11-Advertisement to me, even though it's free. Google main hit is the site's own website. I do play GO, but have not seen enough independent sources to assert notability yet. -- Alexf(talk) 22:21, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- (Speedy?) Delete As per G11 and Alexf. Cheers. Imperat§ r(Talk) 15:01, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable at this time - DustyRain (talk) 16:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.