Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giddy Up (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Giddy Up. (non-admin closure)AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 02:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Giddy Up (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG. No coverage outside minor blogs and doesn't appear to have charted anywhere. I oppose redirecting or merging as there are several other songs of the same name, including the 12th track in B4 the Storm. I highly doubt that this "Giddy Up" by Fe is even the most popular song of this name. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:57, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, as I did not notice that other redirect and I don't think anyone else did. But I recommend sending both Giddy Up (song) (the topic of this AfD) and Giddy Up (Fe song) (currently a redirect) to Giddy Up. The second of those would technically be a "retarget" under WP procedures. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the clarification. You are correct that it should be called a retarget. I only caught the other redirect while typing my own comments. It can be easier to miss those. Aoba47 (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.