Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GeForce 1000 series

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen | talk 16:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GeForce 1000 series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is based on pure speculation, no naming sheme for the new generation has been confirmed. Should not have been created without having some basic facts Denniss (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article should indeed not have been created without a citation for the name of the GPU family. Note that there are citations, though. These are primarily around the name of the microarchitecture (Pascal), mind you. It's also worth noting that the product family will be released later this year. In any case, I withhold my vote. --Yamla (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. --Ixfd64 (talk) 21:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: WP:TOOSOON. None of the references mention a 1000 series, which suggests speculation on the part of the author. I understand that what the author wanted was an article about the next generation GeForce series, but couldn't call it "Forthcoming next generation GeForce series product", and decided to name it. But:
    • the lack of a name — even a codename — is a strong indication that the product is not so far into the planning phase as to have gelled, and
    • the lack of references provided by anyone other than Nvidia indicate that at this point the only information available is promotional, and doesn't speak to notability.
With a made-up name, how are people even expected to find this article? ubiquity (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.