Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gateway Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 14:41, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gateway Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP: NCOMPANY, in that there is no verifiable evidence that company has attracted significant/in-depth coverage in multiple independent verifiable secondary sources (see WP:ORGCRIT - which generally follows WP:GNG but puts a greater emphasis on the quality of the sources, in order to eliminate justification on the basis of press and promotional coverage of the company being used as arguements that there is significant coverage in multiple sources. Dan arndt (talk) 05:13, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 06:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, I've searched and can't find any reliable sources that support WP:NCOMPANY - just because the company owns schools in Sri Lanka doesn't make it automatically notable. If you can find evidence that satisfies WP:ORGCRIT then I be prepared to reconsider this nomination. Dan arndt (talk) 09:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ ""Gateway Group" Sri Lanka - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2019-03-07.
Comment, @Nirvanatoday: in accordance with WP:GNG, they need to provide significant coverage not just mentions in passing in press releases or promotional pieces as most of thses appear to be. Can you be more specific as to which reference supports the organization's notability - rather than just a Google search link. Dan arndt (talk) 02:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:21, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 07:44, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.