Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatima Cavalieri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - filelakeshoe 18:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fatima Cavalieri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references and no statements to suggest notability, other than having a career. I could find nothing in google that was not her website or blog - nothing editorial. Since 2009 tagged for references, ad, notability, orphan and improvement, with none being done. Fails WP:ANYBIO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk • contribs) 2012-12-07 00:03:47
- Delete - Google News US and Brazil provided nothing but I found a magazine article here which appears to talk about her but the text is too small and not English and I found a photo here at an event so it's probably most definite sources are not English. If other users believe the magazine article is sufficient or other sources are provided, I'm willing to recall my vote. SwisterTwister talk 00:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not finding any sources, has barely any third-party representation on Web. I am with SwisterTwister here, if sources in other languages emerge, then willing to recall vote. Mabalu (talk) 10:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.