Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering of Lodz University of Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lodz University of Technology. Davewild (talk) 07:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering of Lodz University of Technology

Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering of Lodz University of Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG on its own. No independent sources in article. Delete or merge with Lodz University of Technology. See closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Chemistry of Lodz University of Technology and related open AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faculty of Material Technologies and Textile Design of Lodz University of Technology. Jbh^Talk 14:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Jbh^Talk 14:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC) Struck delete Jbh^Talk 00:58, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

• Merge with university article. —Мандичка^YO 😜 15:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
• Merge instead just redirect, as was done for mentioned Faculty of Chemistry (what resulted in the deletion of all information). Chrumps (talk) 19:39, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Please note all of the information is available in the page history. When a redirect is made it is just another version of the page. Nothing is lost. Jbh^Talk 23:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:44, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.