Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional clearing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:36, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Emotional clearing

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Emotional clearing

Emotional clearing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing is coming up on google or google scholar from a secondary source such as a Review Article. It appears not to have been taken up at all really. Hence is not notable. Unless it is called something else. But I can't see anything salvageable here. As it is psychological/medical it really needs some of these sources to justify its existence here Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:22, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

• Delete; non-notable and un-V-able. Or should that be namespace clearing? The hint is in the fact that the first sentence is about the person who discovered/introduced it. JFW | T@lk 20:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
• Delete--per lack of results in Cas Liber's reported search above. Lesion (talk) 21:25, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. I couldn't find any sources to demonstrate notability. Axl ¤ [Talk] 23:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
• Delete. Need refs Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 07:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

• Comment - there are lots of scholarly articles with this phrase therein, but I'm not sure they're all about the same concept. Bearian (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

My impression was that it came up as the two words were being often used as a nonspecific concept unrelated to this topic being discussed here. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

It's sort of a mess, using the term to mean different concepts. Now, I'm leaning delete per WP:TNT. Bearian (talk) 23:12, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.