Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed, Edd n Eddy (season 1)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 09:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ed, Edd n Eddy (season 1) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose this should redirect to List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes because the majority of its sources are also linked to in the main article. This season does not stand alone among the rest for notability, just quality IMO. See my similar AfDs for the season 3 and 4 articles. Paper Luigi TC 00:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:40, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: I don't have anything against keeping this article, but neither do I have anything against merging the plot descriptions into List of Ed, Edd n Eddy episodes and the rest of the article's info into Ed, Edd n Eddy. -Jpcase (talk) 15:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This was a non-admin relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 05:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
There's some interesting info in this article currently absent from the parent article - e.g. Mike Drucker's review of the series for IGN, the column by the Tallahassee journalist about jawbreakers, and the sentence about early fansites. So merging would be the best way to go. --Jpcase (talk) 16:41, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.