Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economy of Réunion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per nom's comment below. (non-admin closure) st170e 19:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Economy of Réunion

Economy of Réunion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem notable enough as its own article Shaded0 (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

• Keep - "Economy of X" is a standard article for significant geopolitical entities. This is an island of 2,500 km² and close to a million people. There's going to be plenty of sources about its economy, primarily in French. Take a look at the article in the French wikipedia for examples. Υπογράφω (talk) 04:32, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Keep - this is clearly notable enough, as per Υπογράφω. No reason to exacerbate systematic bias with deletion.--Bkwillwm (talk) 05:04, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• It does seem like a perfectly viable main article for Category:Economy of Réunion. Keep. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Keep perfectly acceptable topic. Lepricavark (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Snow Keep - Nomination rationale amounts to basically nothing, ample precedent exists for the type of article, and without even looking for additional sources, a substantial French article exists from which to expand the English one. TimothyJosephWood 15:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Keep An appropriately notable topic that exists within the well-defined structure of Category:Economies by country and meets the notability standard, as written. Alansohn (talk) 16:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - Honest mistake, I missed the fact this was an island and probably is notable enough as a Category:Economies by country entry. I assumed this was a region in France that wasn't fully fleshed out by the creator. Looking at the French language article it does indeed look like there is enough there for an article translation/expansion. Shaded0 (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.