Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebix Smartclass Educational Services

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Ebix Smartclass Educational Services

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ebix Smartclass Educational Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage are press releases, passing mentions, or routing coverage. Does not seem to meet WP:NCORP. Could be redirected to Ebix. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• Comment: See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebix Smartclass. MarioGom (talk) 11:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete: The available coverage concerns the process under which this former Educomp Solutions business line was separated and then sold to Ebix (which is already covered in more detail in the Educomp Solutions article); such coverage falls under routine coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. I am not seeing evidence that Ebix Smartclass Educational Services has attained notability in itself. AllyD (talk) 10:59, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing said about this firm other than routine business actions, and since it's been acquired, its history is over before it's become notable. FalconK (talk) 22:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.