Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E1 Music discography
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. An article that's forever doomed to be either unusably incomplete, or unusably massive. Consensus here is that no form this article could take would make for a reasonable encyclopedia article. ~ mazca talk 21:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- E1 Music discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
E1 Music is a distributor of about eight zillion labels. There is no way that this could ever be complete, and this is a very half-assed start to begin with. I know that they have way more than rap artists on the label. This is comparable to Sony BMG discography; it would become incredibly long and complicated if kept, and there is no precedent for having discographies by label. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per precedent. A page as such for E1 is particularly problematic because E1, and its predecessor Koch, are an avenue for any independent labels or project of generally any genre to seek distribution-only agreements with the company. Imperatore (talk) 22:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete While I disagree with your estimate of eight zillion labels, there are clearly far too many to include them all reasonably in this article. --Bsay@CSU[ π ] 22:02, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm still not sure about allowing label discographies generally, but discographies of distributors and parent companies, listing releases on their various labels? No, sorry, way too unwieldy. ReverendWayne (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.